On July 1, 2005 without prior
warning, Methodist Medical Center in a
diabolical move demolished the Peoria
Universalist/Unitarian Church,
908 Hamilton Boulevard -- a century-old,
unique work of art.
Today it is just another green area. Flat. Ugly.
WE WILL NOT FORGET!
What might have been.
The reality:
Historic
preservation is the only valid basis for saving inner city and deteriorating
neighborhoods.
Denver called a
moratorium on demolition, and it paid off big for that city.
In St. Louis, Mo., Soulard, the historic district, does not allow demolition of anything, and it's one of the most desirable inner city neighborhoods to live in, with residences worth six figures and more.
Here's the way the building looked just prior to demolition. It was listed by the Landnmarks Preservation Council of Illinois as one of the 10 most endangered historic places in Illinois for 2005.
• PRE-DEMOLITION INFORMATION: (Didn't save it.)
- The historic Universalist/Unitarian
Church building, 908 Hamilton Boulevard, is now owned by Methodist Medical
Center.
• It could be demolished by Aug 1, 2005 unless the hospital decides to
re-use it.
• The building is structurally sound, has excellent acoustics, and would
make a good auditorium for meetings and concerts, or medical museum, or
both.
• Designed by architect B.L. Hulsebus in Classical Revival Style, the
1911-vintage building is a unique work of art.
• Lydia Moss Bradley contributed to its building. Jane Addams, Clarence
Darrow and Bertrand Russell spoke to Peoria audiences in the building.
• Peoria cannot afford to lose another of its historic structures, which
alone keep it from looking like everytown, USA.
|
|
|
|
At the time, Methodist was paying it's CEO $500,000 a year. It was spending $1 million a year on advertising including skyboxes at the ball park and fireworks.
It didn't even need the lot and has never used it for anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFTERMATH: UUs built a new church in the suburbs, went $500,000
over budget. That's what it would have cost to completely renovate the
historic building. They chose a "virgin" site, where in the fall of
2006, six oak trees had died from "construction injury, drought, disease
or a combination of causes," the church newsletter reported.
|
|
_________________________________
|
A
brief history of the Peoria UU Church
|
|
The building at 708 Hamilton
Boulevard, designed by Peoria architect B. L. Hulsebus in Classical Revival
style, was dedicated May 28, 1911.
The Universalist church in Peoria
was organized on May 6, 1843, and has been an integral part of the community
and the church home of many of Peoria's most active and community-minded
citizens from its earliest days, among them Tobias and Lydia Moss Bradley,
who founded and gave the land for Bradley University, the Peoria Park
District and other civic entities.
When the congregation grew and
needed to build a new church on Main Street in 1866, members subscribed
generously and Tobias Bradley and Sidney Pulsifer advanced additional funds
to complete the church. It was dedicated Jan. 1, 1868. The United
States General Convention of Universalists was held in the church in 1885.
As the church grew it continued to
need more space. It sold the Main Street building to the Masons at the
turn of the 20th century and bought the present site, 708 Hamilton Boulevard.
A small Gothic church designed by
Herbert E. Hewitt was first built on the site, but shortly after Dr. B. G.
Carpenter became minister in 1907, the congregation needed to expand and
decided to build on the same site a church of classic Grecian design which
would afford greater seating capacity.
At the 1911 dedication of the new building, the Peoria
Star newspaper wrote, "It is not too much to say that (the church's)
influence in this city is in the highest degree helpful, spiritual and in
line with advanced thought." (click on the image, left and below, to see
larger views.)
In 1919, wings were added to each side of the building,
increasing the seating capacity to nearly 800, at a cost of $31,000.
From 1911 and through the 1920s,
long before television or C-Span were available, the church was known widely
for its Sunday Evening Lecture series which became so popular that the Fire
Marshall issued a warning that people could not be seated in the aisles.
Leading speakers including Jane
Addams of Hull House, the English mathematician and philosopher Bertrand
Russell and famed lawyer Clarence Darrow were among those who came to Peoria
and spoke there.
In 1930, Dr. Clinton Lee Scott
became the minister and under his leadership a drive began to rid Peoria of
illegal gambling. He was the only Universalist minister to sign the
Humanist Manifesto. Scott and his wife, Mary, founded a birth control clinic,
and he became a nationally known author of works such as "Religion Can Make Sense" (1949).
In 1960, on a national level the
Universalists merged with Unitarians, and the name was changed. In
1962, after a $90,000 renovation and expansion, Dr. Dana McLean Greeley, the
first president of the Unitarian Universalist Association, commended the
church for remodeling its original structure and remaining a downtown church.
"It is an occasion for rejoicing that you have remained to serve in the
heart of your community," he stated, as quoted in The Sesquicentennial
History of the Universalist-Unitarian Church of Peoria (1993).
In 1968, during the Vietnam war
era, the church formed the Peoria Area Peace Committee and allowed draft
counseling to take place, because potential draftees had practically no where
else to go to learn of their rights under the Selective Service laws.
The building has long served as a meeting place for activist groups such as
local chapters of the National Organization for Women and the American Civil
Liberties Union.
It recently served as a site for
an anti-war, pro-peace meeting after a downtown march, shortly before the
U.S. invaded Iraq.
Architecturally the building
is unique in Peoria and significant for its Classical Revival style.
Its dome contains a magnificent stained glass skylight which admits light
into the sanctuary. Two of its stained glass windows depict scenes from
nature, a mountain view and a forested stream.
The building is sound and has had
many improvements made to it. It is part of the "street of
churches" on Hamilton Boulevard.
(A version of this history
was presented to the Peoria Historic Preservation Commission in August,
2003.)
|
_________________________________
ANOTHER PEORIA LANDMARK DESTROYED?
Architect Bernard L. Hulsebus (1876-1957, right with wife,
Edna) was a civic leader in Peoria, Ill, and a member of the
city’s Building
Code Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, the Central Illinois Chapter of the
American Institute
of Architects, as well as the Creve Coeur Club and the Odd
Fellows Lodge. He once served as president of the Rotary
Club.
He designed Methodist Hospital in 1920 and the building is still standing though modifications
have disguised
its design.
Ironically, hospital officials now
want to demolish another significant building that Hulsebus designed,
the
Universalist/Unitarian Church, next door to Methodist.
With its dome, the church in some
ways is reminiscent of Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello.
Jefferson was never a Unitarian but he rejected the trinity and held beliefs
similar to those of Unitarians
and Universalists. Hulsebus may have understood
this connection and incorporated it into his design for the church.
Among the many buildings that
Hulsebus designed, Whittier School, 1617 W. Fredonia near Bradley University
in
Peoria, is still in use.
His home at 1204 N. Parkside remains
a family residence in one of Peoria’s historical areas.
Hulsebus was born in Iowa in 1876
and married Mary Neptune in 1899. She died in 1932. He then married
Edna Marx,
who died in 1978. A nurse, she was a graduate of Methodist Medical Center
School of Nursing.
Hulsebus died in 1957, but his
survivors live on. He and his wife Mary had two children.
Their son Everett, an
architect in California, had two sons and several grandchildren and
great-grandchildren.
Their daughter, Gretchen Iben,
endowed an arts series at a Presbyterian Church in Peoria.
The architect and his wife.
Hulsebus designed the original building for Methodist Medical Center, shown here.
HERE IS THE FLIER PRESENTED TO THE CHURCH CONGREGATION BEFORE THEY VOTED TO SELL THE CHURCH
|
|
Methodist Medical Center is asking
UU Church members to do what it can never do itself: destroy a historic
Peoria landmark. This Faustian bargain would destroy our church’s
identity and history. Methodist should never have asked for this
destruction. It has other land and resources. But since it has asked,
we must say ‘No!’
SUPPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION
“This particular place
represented the city at its finest and most humane. It must be
retained. We destroy so many parts of our history. That is one of
our problems of today -- no memory of yesterday, like national Alzheimer‘s
disease.“ --Studs Terkel on 4/17/03 as he picketed to save
another historic landmark slated for demolition in Chicago, Cook County
Hospital.
“I can show you 1,000 tired industrial towns in our country. Which ones
will have the guts to take what they have and rise above the difficulties?“
Ecotourism expert Tom Eubanks on 3/28/03 before the Peoria Area Convention
and Visitors Bureau.
The City of Peoria is taking a new look at its historic buildings, as
outsiders tell us these are precious resources that cannot be duplicated, and
add unique value to keep the area from totally succumbing to ‘the malling of
America.‘ Our church, on Hamilton Boulevard, “the boulevard of
churches,“ is now part of historic Peoria tours.
Other groups in Peoria have fought and sacrificed to save the area’s heritage
sites. Springdale Cemetery has been saved by a genuine grassroots
movement whose leaders jeopardized their reputations and their wallets in
their cause, and continue to do so. The GAR Hall also has been preserved by
people with nothing to gain for themselves.
A replica church building in another location cannot replace what we have
now. What if the GAR Hall, the Flanagan House, Peoria’s City Hall or other
historic sites had been demolished and rebuilt elsewhere?
Other churches are staying put downtown, renovating and prospering. We
can too!
WE CAN RAISE THE FUNDS TO STAY DOWNTOWN
A fundraising drive over several years will strengthen our
congregation, as we work together for a common goal. The building needs can
be prioritized, and met. We likely will qualify for grants to help.
Historic preservation is national policy, and the state encourages it
as well.
See the National Trust for
Historic Preservation at www.nthp.org. .
A realistic fund drive would raise $50,000 to $100,000 per year for
renovation, by seeking long term pledges. Funds can be borrowed against these
pledges if necessary. Other churches have done this, and so can we.
Here’s how it would look with definite goals to be achieved. The
fund totals, on the high side, include architectural and other fees:
Phase 1, 1-2 years: boiler/air-conditioning $117,000
Phase 2, 1-2 years: elevator-LULA $116,000
Phase 3, 1-2 years: remodel restrooms/classrooms/coat area/stained glass
$103,100
Phase 4, 1-2 years: sanctuary(plaster/paint/sound
system/floor/cushions/balcony)
and kitchen $109,520
Phase 5: organ. (Not included in the new-church figures anyway!)
Yes it will take a while to turn our present church into mint condition. It’s
worth it. It likely will be completed in time to celebrate the
building’s centennial, in 2011!
If we get a UUA or other historic preservation grant, and/or individuals
champion these projects, the timetable could be speeded up.
“As we slouch toward mediocrity, as we rush to become ‘Anywhere
USA,’ we destroy the very things that define our city. The more we chip
away at our architectural heritage, the less able we are to orient ourselves
in place and time, and to distinguish ourselves from the generic, monotonous
mass of contemporary America.” John Watson, 4/22/03, letter to Chicago
Tribune.
NO FEAR, NO FREEBIES
Public opinion will never allow Methodist to threaten us or surround
us. The hospital needs city approval for any construction, along with public
good will. We would have a strong case to protect our historic landmark from
encroachment. Methodist, a not-for-profit charity, should be spending
its funds on the uninsured sick instead of destroying a historic Peoria
church and landmark.
People don’t value what they don’t pay for. Accepting Methodist’s
destruction money could threaten the integrity of our congregation, depriving
it of purpose, as our church loses its unique identity to become just another
suburban church among many. We now serve as a meeting place for liberal
groups, because of our central location. Let’s stay downtown, in the heart of
the city, on the boulevard of churches.
We should do it. We can do it!
(No church funds were used to
create, copy and mail this flier.)
LETTERS TO THE PEORIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
August
4, 2003
Peoria Historic Preservation Commission
City Hall
419 Fulton
Peoria, IL 61602
Dear Commissioners:
Thank you for voting to hold a public hearing on landmark status for the Peoria
Universalist-Unitarian Church. We appreciate your commitment to the
larger community of Peoria, which needs to preserve its historic buildings.
We are enclosing a page from the most recent edition of the church newsletter,
suggesting talking points for the advocates of the destruction of this unique
building. As you can see, there is no objectivity or second thoughts here from
this group. We touched on some of these points in our previous letter, but we
rebut them as they are listed here:
1. The church cannot afford to spend the money: Not true. Other UU
churches elsewhere have held successful building renovation campaigns.
The building is not now dilapidated and could be improved gradually with
the help of pledges and would be eligible for a $200,000 grant from the
national Unitarian/Universalist Association. The truth is that certain
church leaders have decided they would rather spend their money on other
things, that some are enjoying their temporary roles as wheeler-dealer
developers, and that some operate or are involved with community not-for-profit
organizations and may fear the fund raising competition with their own
workplaces.
2. Landmark status would isolate: Would it? What are
Methodist’s plans for this site? No one knows. We doubt the city would
allow plans that would totally isolate the church.
3. Killing the deal at the last minute: Those opposed to the sale
and demolition argued it would be controversial. The advocates for the sale
didn’t listen and now whine about the controversy. Obviously there was no
controversy until the deal was made public.
4. Two years of planning: Not true, unless a secret conspiracy was set up
from the beginning. Two years ago Methodist asked the church how much it
wanted for the property, a committee was set up to study that, and the process
moved from there. The congregation had about a month to consider the offer,
then those who attended the meeting voted (less than 50 percent of the entire
membership.) This is a decision done in haste, not over two years.
5. Landmark status could prevent growth. Not true. The church
is gaining substantial property from the relocation of Knoxville Avenue due to
I-74 reconstruction and would have the space for expansion.
6. Taking parts of the building...: This is true -- but it will not
replace the loss to the community of a unique and visible building, and taking
the windows, etc., may discourage Methodist from preserving the building
itself for other purposes.
But let’s be clear here. Methodist initiated this process, so we
encourage you to put Methodist on the spot at the hearing -- to find out
exactly what they plan and why they are paying more than three times the
property’s assessed value. Ask them whether they plan to preserve the
building. It could become a hospital chapel, for example, a small auditorium
for training or programs (it has great acoustics) or a hospital/medical
museum or all three.
Please note that the committee negotiating the deal with Methodist (without
church input) to our knowledge never considered selling with the condition that
Methodist preserve the building for its own use. But that could still be
negotiated. Why hasn’t it been considered?
You probably have confronted this situation before: the buyers want what
they want, regardless of the larger good to the community, and the sellers are
seduced by the money, feeling like they’ve won the lottery. We ask that you
take the larger view, and work to preserve Peoria’s historic architecture. If
some UUs don’t care enough about the larger community to do that, then perhaps
Methodist does.
Methodist is a founder of Peoria Next which seeks to attract high quality
business and employees to the community. One of Peoria’s main assets is
its historic look that makes it different from other cities. Perhaps the
hospital will have second thoughts about keeping the building, a piece of
Peoria’s history, and a deal can be negotiated that will save the building. At
this point creative thinking is required, and is worth trying.
Sincerely yours,
ELAINE and GEORGE HOPKINS
Peoria, Il.
6/25/03
To: The Peoria Historic Preservation Commission
Peoria, IL.
Dear Commission:
Thank you for expressing concern about the potential destruction of the
historic and unique Universalist-Unitarian Church. We have been
members of this church since the early 1980s, and are very concerned about
the hasty and unwise decision of the membership to sell to Methodist Medical
Center.
We are also concerned about Methodist’s motives and intentions in offering to
purchase the property at a price more than triple its appraised value, surely
a tempting but unwise offer from a not-for-profit charity hospital which
takes millions in state and federal tax money to fund its activities.
We also are wondering how this purchase would affect that funding,
which is formula-based.
We are enclosing an ad that Methodist ran in the Journal Star this week.
Note the marked section, which states Methodist must invest excess
funds “in programs and services which enhance the health and well-being of
our community.“ It’s hard to understand how destruction of a historic
building follows that mission.
We hope you will hold a public hearing on the UU church property to explore
those motives and plans, and to hold both the church and the hospital
accountable for the impact of their decision on the public interest in Peoria
to maintain its historic resources.
You should be aware that the UU church membership was not fully represented at
the meeting where the vote to sell occurred. Church Bylaws say only
members present can vote, and those members defeated efforts to amend the
Bylaws to allow for absentee ballots on this important issue.
In the end only 50 percent of the entire membership approved the sale, after
a balloting process that some also considered unfair. An attempt to change
that process also was defeated.
Church spokespersons have said the membership cannot afford to maintain the
building. That is not true. The building is sound and in good
condition. It has been maintained over the years. It would take
perhaps $500,000 to $600,000 to restore the building and its contents
including a historic organ to mint, like-new condition with an elevator for
better handicapped access. Those funds could be raised over several years.
Those of us who wanted to save the building had garnered $70,000 in
pledges in only a few weeks, and had many fund raising ideas which the
decision short-circuited.
If you need more information, we can send you the minutes of the meeting and
information on the building and what it would take to upgrade it and its
contents to perfect condition.
Thanks for your concern for Peoria. We have just returned from a
weekend visit to Mineral Point, Wisc., an entire town on the National
Register of Historic Places, where historic churches and other buildings have
been maintained. The trip was a delight. Peoria will be extremely short
sighted to let its historic buildings be demolished. If some do not
recognize that fact, perhaps your leadership will change their minds.
Sincerely yours,
ELAINE and GEORGE HOPKINS
Peoria, Il.
|
|
|
|
|
J
|
|
|
|
WISE WORDS
"Thousands of historic urban houses of worship across the nation...
are
threatened by years of defered maintenance, financial
disinvestment and, in
some instances, soaring real estate values
that make selling the property an
attractive proposition for shrinking
congregations. Abandoning these
buildings would mean losing an
irretrievable part of the nation's cultural
heritage..."
Diane Cohen and Robert Jaeger, co-founders and directors of
Partners for
Sacred Places, a preservation group, quoted in the
Washington Post, 6/14/03,
and republished in the UU World,
Sept. 2003, Testimony, p. 19.
www.sacredplaces.org
email: [email protected]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.