PEORIA -- Long time Peoria County States Attorney Kevin Lyons must be wondering what he has done, or not done, to be faced with a high profile challenger this late in his career.
Lyons, a Democrat, has not had a credible opponent in years. Now he is locked in a hot race against Republican Darin LaHood, son of retiring 18th District Congressman Ray LaHood, R-Peoria, and the elder LaHood's political machine.
Huge, expensive LaHood signs are everywhere. All the police departments have endorsed LaHood. Even Patti Polk, formerly vice president of the Peoria County Democratic Women and the wife of the 18th District Democratic committeeman James Polk, has publicly endorsed LaHood and held a fund-raiser for him.
Darin LaHood reportedly wanted to run for his father's Congressional seat but was aced out early by the aggressive state Rep. Aaron Schock, who represents the 92nd District in the Illinois House. Schock acquired early endorsements from Republican officials in his race for the Congressional seat.
So LaHood took a lesson from Schock, who politicized the formerly non-political Peoria District 150 School Board to prepare for his first statehouse run in 2004. The ploy worked for Schock. Will it work for LaHood?
At a debate between Lyons and LaHood on Thursday, Sept. 11, LaHood used the language of politics to promote his candidacy. The States Attorney should be a leader in fighting crime, he said, and "proactive" in setting up programs such as assigning prosecutors to work in high crime areas.
"If you're happy with the status quo, I'm not your candidate," LaHood told the audience of primarily staff members from Peoria's child welfare agencies.
In a less political presentation, Lyons told the audience that the States Attorney has two roles, to manage the office of 60 workers, half lawyers, and be an excellent trial lawyer who wins cases and sets an example for his staff.
As for juvenile cases, Lyons said, "it's a very complicated matter." He told of sentencing a man to a 15-year prison term who has three unborn children on the way with different pregnant women. Those will be fatherless children, he said.
LaHood said Peorians are so afraid of crime that they're moving out of the city. He contended "better communication" between those involved in juvenile and child welfare cases would move the cases more quickly through the legal system. "Let's make the States Attorney accessible and bring those entities together," he said.
Lyons responded "what he just told you is wrong." The States Attorney attends the local Juvenile Justice Council, he said. "We work to keep juveniles out of prison "
The incarceration rate for juveniles has dropped to 52 last year from 70 something previously, thanks to a state funded program, he said.
Lyons said he has learned from long experience, "just saying it doesn't make it true."
LaHood said prosecution should be driven by "the safety in the community," and should work to deter crime and "send a message." Is he implying prosecution without adequate evidence, just to intimidate some people? And what would that cost? No one asked.
Lyons said "we prosecute when evidence is credible."
LaHood would like to "look at the plea agreement system," and cited crime statistics showing Peoria has the highest crime rate per capita in Illinois.
Lyons disputed that, but LaHood said the police are "sick of plea agreements" and have endorsed him.
Lyons responded that he does not accept endorsements from "police labor unions" in the county. "I have prosecuted 23 police officers. You've got to do what you've got to do. It's the right thing to do," he said.
LaHood responded, "for the first time in 20 years he's not seeking endorsements."
Of Lyons's 94 percent conviction rate, "a lot of that is plea bargaining," LaHood said. "We have a crime problem. We can do things differently."
Lyons said the jail was built to hold 415 inmates, but there are "520 today" and often 600 there. Illinois has 43,000 people in its prisons. "Are the prisons not full enough?" he asked. "It's about judges and about balance."
The debate format involved written questions that had been furnished to the candidates previously. They each spoke for three minutes, and could comment on each other's remarks. But there were no questions allowed from the audience, and no follow up questions from the moderator.
This format ignored real issues with the juvenile court and child welfare system that each candidate should answer before the election, including why most children caught up in the system are black and what can be done about that.
Another issue is whether juvenile courts should be closed to the public, including bloggers, which the States Attorney's office does not consider real journalists.
The juvenile courts are open by Illinois law to journalists, but in a case last year, the States Attorney's office opposed allowing a blogger to cover a juvenile case, even though the defendant OKed it. With one party opposed, the judge would not allow it.
This raised but did not resolve the issues of who is a journalist and whether the government should decide who is a journalist.
Relatives such as grandparents are also kept out of these courts, though juvenile cases have been opened to all in other states, including Missouri, to allow more public scrutiny of the system.
Would one of these candidates champion this issue with the General Assembly?
There will be other debates between these two candidates where these issues can be explored.
-- Elaine Hopkins