PEORIA -- Here's an interesting post on Diane Vespa's blog, concerning the strange goings on at Peoria District 150 and Lindbergh School, where principal Julie McArdle was terminated a few weeks ago, and in return filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit.
Vespa has interviewed many of the teachers at Lindberg, who turned to her after District 150 officials refused to speak with them. It's an amazing story, a must read!
The Lindbergh School story is almost old news, as every week some new horror surfaces at District 150. The latest: the firing of the grade and middle school library clerks and managers, said to be essential to the smooth functioning of these schools.
They were told in a mass meeting last week that their jobs would be gone next year. But nobody bothered to tell the Board of Education, some of whose members are reportedly miffed over the slight. They must vote to terminate these library workers. The next board meeting, on June 1, promises to be very exciting if this item makes it to the board agenda.
Last week's meeting, on May 18, brought forth the usual citizen comments with one new addition, mine. Here is what I told the board:
I am Elaine Hopkins, and live with my husband George Hopkins (in Peoria).
We now are both retired. I retired from the Journal Star in 2007, and my husband retired then from Western Illinois University where he was a professor of history. We can afford to live anywhere, but so far we have stayed in Peoria where we support the arts and organizations that contribute to the area’s well being.
Of course we continue to value education. District 150 students are the future workers and citizens that we all will depend on. Thus we are concerned to see District 150 falling apart, due to decisions by school officials and the school board.
The district is out of money because it has wasted millions on programs with no educational payoff. Now it must raise taxes. We are not opposed to tax increases for education, but we are opposed to waste.
The coming tax increases will likely diminish the value of all Peoria properties, including our residence, speeding up the spiral of failure in Peoria.
How has money been wasted?
Forget the Glen Oak Park fiasco, which took properties off the tax rolls that now sit vacant. That’s small change compared with Edison.
The district has paid millions to Edison when its own experienced staff could have replicated or improved on the Edison programs. Why?
But that’s only money, the amount that taxes must now be raised.
Even more serious is the district’s decision to close some schools, and build new schools rather than renovate its historic schools. That’s not only more expensive for taxpayers in the long run, but tends to destroy one of Peoria’s valuable intangibles: its sense of community.
Peoria cannot control what local businesses do – they may fail, shift work elsewhere or leave town. But Peoria can control its historic legacy and its sense of community. That’s not happening, however.
I personally have seen the sense of community at Kingman School between teachers, parents and students and its neighborhood. Closing that school destroys that community. Likely the same is true of other neighborhood schools.
Closing Woodruff High School and restructuring Peoria Central High School will do even more damage to tradition and the sense of community connected with these two schools.
What will replace that? Alienation? How long will it take to regain the sense of community and tradition connected with those two high schools? Or can it ever be replicated?
School officials claim that teachers must be eliminated to save money. I thought that attrition over the years and retirement incentives were supposed to do that. Keeping the buildings open costs very little.
Many Illinois high schools are much smaller than these two schools, and smaller schools are thought to be more effective in educating students.
Now there is talk of charter schools. They are unneeded, another waste of money, as programs can be set up within the existing schools so that all students have access to them. But charter schools can be used to threaten and destroy the teacher’s union, another community that supports education.
There’s more: Abolishing 8th grade graduation diminishes community. So does cutting back summer school.
The district’s logic is akin to Wacky Wednesdays, where less was officially spun as more. (I have heard those Wednesday sessions are mostly worthless for the teachers, and probably a continuing headache for parents.)
These changes to District 150 are unlikely to improve the education of students and more likely to diminish it in the general uproar connected with such changes. It’s like offering new Coke at a higher price, probably with the same results. No takers.
Public education is a calling, not a profit-making business. It should not a platform for careerism, or be involved in union busting, or forcing down wages of its employees while the managers receive excessive pay. It’s not a jobs program for friends and relatives.
Yet that’s the way District 150 appears to be operating, chasing the latest business-type fad without considering the implications: larger classes, lower pay for teachers, less qualified teachers, the destruction of tradition and community.
The school board is elected to represent the interests of the community, and not be a rubber stamp for school administrators.
Board members should not have their eyes on the next election they can win, or the better job they can snag, or be tempted by perks and job offers for their friends and relatives. Any of that means the good of the community as a whole is likely to suffer.
Who benefits from the loss of community and tradition in Peoria? Is it the developers, who need to sell their McMansions sitting vacant in other school districts? Is it the slumlords and payday loan operators who prey on the poor left behind in Peoria?
I am saddened at what is happening to a once proud school district, and angry that we taxpayers must pay more for much less, because with the proper leadership it doesn’t have to be that way.
-- Elaine Hopkins