PEORIA -- The Peoria District 150 School Board is considering limiting public comment at its meetings.
Apparently some board members are tired of hearing people in the audience voice their ideas and opinions to the board.
But curbing public input would be a terrible mistake.
At the Aug. 17 meeting, nine people, including me, spoke to the board, which limits comments to five minutes. Every person, including me, had something important to say to the board.
Here are some of the topics the speakers addressed:
Increased class sizes, school closings, ways to increase the number of pupils (require new hires to live in the district and offer incentives for teachers to live in the district), reading programs that work, lst grade classes today of 30 students (!), the unwarranted expense of keeping the Edison contract, expensive $350-per-day consultants (mostly retired administrators) doing work that administrators should be doing, lack of closure plans for Woodruff High School including 1,000 students with no place to go (!), an increase to 8-hour day for teachers (who already put in much overtime at home grading papers, planning, etc.).
But the most exciting suggestion came from Sharon Crews, a retired Manual High School English teacher, who suggested turning Manual into an alternative school for discipline problems, and/or a vocational school. See her terrific speech below.
I urged the board not to limit public comment, and to consider a statement from the 19th century, as quoted in the Peoria Journal Star, about the outlook of the people who built today's world. It's an attitude that I recall in my own parents:
"Their chief aim was not great wealth but civilization. So while they built their homes, they helped build schoolhouses and churches, sometimes living in the dwellings lacking conveniences so that they might provide the other necessities of civilization."
(From Benjamin J. Radford, publisher of the Woodford County Journal, who also was a minister and taught at Eureka College from 1870-1881.)
To elaborate: what District 150 needs is to maintain and create civilization through education, and not scheme for ways to pad pockets and loot the system. Retired administrators should retire and not be on the payroll for $350 a day. Edison should have been ditched long ago. Schools that are true neighborhood communities, like Kingman and Woodruff High School, should not be closed, etc.
Before the meeting about 300 people rallied outside the building. Many were teachers, whose contract is threatened by -- one said -- almost three dozen give backs. They could end up striking if the contract is not settled.
Among the demands: an 8-hour day for teachers, from those who apparently do not understand how educators, like other professionals such as artists and musicians, spend hours outside the classroom working to prepare or perfect their teaching.
Teacher and union activist Hedy Elliott Gardner made the point that what the board should fear most is if nobody attends the meetings to speak, because no one cares about Peoria's public school district.
Banning public comment or severely limiting it might just accomplish that!
-- Elaine Hopkins
Here is what Sharon Crews told the School Board: (Sharon for superintendent? Yes!)
If you want to save District 150, your first order of business should be the establishment of a bona fide alternative school and a vocational school.
Summer has perhaps caused you to forget that discipline problems plague our schools. Also, currently 150 offers nothing but watered-down academics to the many students who will not go to a four-year college. Consequently, many college-bound students are also getting watered-down academics.
I propose that Manual become those two schools under one roof. I predict that Manual would soon have the largest enrollment of the four high schools.
Put closing a high school on hold until you see how many students are attracted to this “repurposed” Manual.
In the meantime, save district money by putting the 7th and 8th grades at Peoria High and Woodruff-—just as you have done at Manual
Also, you would do well to consider Terry Knapp’s idea to put only the 7th and 8th grade boys at the high schools. Probably you could then close a middle school, instead of a high school for the time being.
That said, I have some comments about the plans still on the table.
To close a high school, a home has to be found for 1,000 students. Mr. Hinton has given you the figure of 850. Please be sure you get beginning of the year figures, not end of the year figures. Otherwise, you could have 100+ students with no classrooms or teachers—and once again get media attention for not planning ahead.
Will the new high school boundaries be an attempt to send more students to Manual? Can Manual accommodate more students? Last year the 9th grade academy was capped at 150 students—and then the usual 190 to 200 showed up.
Thirty of them were sent to Woodruff and Central. How many Manual classrooms sat empty last year? My guess is-—none. Are you sure Manual has room for 100, 200, or 300 more students who would be displaced by closing a high school?
On another topic, recently Mrs. Wolfmeyer asked the administration to conduct exit interviews. Many of the Manual faculty were either pink-slipped or chose not to return.
Why not ask them if Manual lived up to their expectations as first-year teachers? Please, please put on your to-do list, extensive conversations next year with Manual teachers to ask them how they feel about cramming one-year academic courses into one-semester courses.
Manual students will now go without math, English, or science for one semester and a summer every year.
Aren’t you worried about retention rates if you have any hope that Manual will improve its AYP. Remember English, math, and science are the only reasons Manual had to be restructured. Those three subjects are the only ones that make any difference to NCLB.
No matter how wonderful,the content of Johns Hopkins courses will not be on the NCLB test.
Remember that in 2010 the required percentage for AYP will be 77. percent--that’s a long way from last year’s AYP of 8 percent.
On the positive side, I believe Johns Hopkins offers a reading intervention for freshmen that seems to have merit. I wish the district had offered such an intervention much earlier, before restructuring was mandated. You know-—to help the “old” faculty who begged for 10 to 15 years for such help-—I personally begged for it.
You know, the faculty that was given no help and then told “You had your chance.”
Now, why are these reading interventions offered only at Manual? There are students at all three other high schools who do not read at grade level.
As for the Johns Hopkins reading intervention program, I believe that the gains might not be sufficient or permanent enough to help raise AYP significantly, especially if students have only one semester of English, math, and science at every grade level.
Comment 8/18/09 by Ed Dentino:
The school facility issues are getting the practical and sentimental sides pretty well vetted. My understanding is that staff is the significant cost concern. I can't guess what that means in terms of facility choices, class size, administration burden.
I think that moving the Roosevelt Magnet School program to the Manual campus would enhance the status of the Peoria South Valley district.
And Trewyn is overlooked. Perhaps it could become a tech training and vocational skill campus.
I've thought that Manual could be a vocational school. Another idea would be to move the Roosevelt magnet school program to the Manual facility.
Probably, the neighborhood concept of populating schools, libraries, stores, is not going to work again in the city. At least now that the auto and bus transport is the basis for the economic model of urban life.