UPDATE 10/3/09. Read Roger Monroe's comments in the current issue of the Community Word on the Woodruff closing: http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2009/10/02/district-150-gets-an-f/#more-585
He hints of a lawsuit to stop the Woodruff closing.
PEORIA -- Hundreds of people gathered outside the Peoria School District 150 administration building on Sept. 21 to protest the closing of a high school, before the public session of the School Board meeting.
Teens from Woodruff High School and Peoria Central High School gathered in separate groups. The street was closed off for the crowd. Teachers and citizens were mixed in with the groups, and many police were on hand, but the crowd was calm.
Some marched with signs, saying 'close the administration building.'
A Peoria Central football team gathered for a group photo.
A choral group from Woodruff began to sign, substituting "our school" for the lyrics in the song "My Girl."
Many in the crowd complained about the 'divide and conquer' mode of pitting Woodruff versus Peoria Central, and suggested that both schools remain open.
The public comment session began, to be limited to an hour. Peoria activist General Parker opened with a carefully thought out proposal for saving money without closing a high school. His wife, Rachel Parker, is a member of the School Board.
The board voted to close a high school last spring but did not name the school. A new board member then was elected, Laura Petelle, and in her campaign suggested she opposed school closings. But she has said recently she now thinks a school should close.
The board wants to cut its deficit, saying it can save more than $2.7 million by closing a high school.
The argument makes little sense given the millions the District has spent on a contract with Edison Schools, and the likelihood that many middle class students will flee to parochial schools or move out of Peoria, thus cutting the state's per pupil reimbursement.
After an hour and a half of public comments, with only one in favor of closing a high school, then a sort-of debate, mostly speeches saying how they felt bad voting to close a high school, the board voted 4-3 to close Woodruff.
Its ludicrous, really, for board members to paint themselves as victims when they just put the nail in Peoria's coffin. The city, the community and the students are the victims here, not the board members.
Peoria has little going for it except for its storied traditions. Closing Woodruff is a big step toward destroying another neighborhood and another strong tradition.
There was a lot of talk about how a high school closing is necessary to save money, though Stowell suggested that if teachers would take a 3.5 percent pay cut, a closing would not be necessary.
It became apparent the board didn't listen to the thoughtful comments from the podium, where many good, alternative ideas were presented.
Voting in favor to close were Petelle, Gorenz, Wolfmeyer and Butler. Stowell argued for closing and restructuring Peoria Central to become a math and science academy. He, Ross and Parker voted not to close Woodruff.
-- Elaine Hopkins
Here's what General Parker sent to the School Board. It was ignored.
Thank you Madam President, vice-president and fellow board members
Thank you for the opportunity to allow me to make this presentation. This
is a presentation of hope; hope that our city, districts and neighborhoods
will be saved. But as always with Hope & Faith, there is always some
sacrifice.
My only request of you in allowing me to make this presentation is that
you not make any final decisions tonight and that you give these options
serious consideration. To do otherwise would be disingenuous.
After reading a letter posted on a blog from your law firm, it is understood
by its tone that this board make a decision to close a “high school” at this
meeting. This is keeping in line with the PBC’s request to keep and A+
rating with Standard and Poor.
I don’t believe this to be true nor do I agree with this but for the sake of
argument, this is the basis from which we will work on.
Full disclosure, I am never in favor of closing a school or getting rid of
jobs and if, only if it’s necessary, with minimal pain and suffering and
only with a great advantage to the people they serve.
Secondly, I attended all Dist. 150 High Schools except Manual and 4
different Dist. 150 grade schools.
What I plan to offer here are options. Options not to the question of which
High school to close but to how do we reduce our budget deficit to remain
fiscally sound and preserve our rating?
Option #1 Do Nothing - This option , while keeping schools open, does
nothing to reduce the deficit and will lower the districts bond rating.
However, the argument can be made we shouldn’t be in this predicament
anyway because teachers are pink slipped at the end of every year and
should not be called back if enrollment does not allow for it, likewise with
hiring administrators or consultants.
Option #2 Close Manual - Manual is in restructuring so it’s not an
option at this time. Besides, it’s the smallest and there would be no real
savings there, and other schools would have to close to attain a 7-8 million
dollar budget deficit.
Option # 3 – Close Richwoods - This may not be a popular option but it
is a viable one. Of course those students who are financially able to opt
out will do so for private schools, but the remainder can be distributed
evenly among the three inner city high schools. Since Richwood’s has our
top performing students, we can have these students to help boost the
remaining schools test scores and meet AYP.
If it all boils down to money, then it would make sense of get rid of the
highest operational costing school. I told you this one wouldn’t be
popular.
Option#4 – Close PHS
Option #5 – Close WHS
I put these two together and won’t go into them because you already know
they are options and the Pros & cons for keeping or closing either of them.
The problem with #4 & #5 just as with Option 3, I don’t think it gets you
where you need to be in reducing the budget. You would be back soon
enough talking about closing another school or schools.
Also closing Woodruff or Central would be the nail in the coffin that
causes the demise of an already declining neighborhood. As president of
the Heart of Peoria Neighborhood Association I am vehemently opposed
to those options.
Option #6 - Close two high schools and have One North Campus and
One South Campus – This would cause overcrowding as we have about
4,000 high school student and no school in the district can hold 2,000
students let alone two of them.
Option #7 – Has two parts - This is the option I hope you consider as it
is my favorite and one I believe gets us where we need to be. Since this is
all about money and being fiscally sound. This shows several objectives
under two main goals.
Goals being Reducing Expenses and Increasing Revenue
Reduce Expenses – Terminate Edison Contract – I know this has been a
bone of contention but this decision to close a school is about money and
although Edison has done some good, because of past decisions and our
financial position now, we can no longer afford Edison. Saving roughly
$800,000+.
• Close Middle Schools - Our youth are starting to fall off in their
adolescent years. If we take 6 & 7th graders who will be 7th & 8th
graders next year and place them in the High Schools, as was did
with Manual, and make 7th & 8th Grade Academy’s in each high
school, I believe we are starting to address the problems both
academically and fiscally.
The 5th graders would go to back and finish the 6th grade in their
primary school. Thus we will have k – 6 in all primary and 7th & 8th
grade academies in all four high schools.
This would be approximately *1,393 students divided among the 4
high schools.
*Denotes no numbers for Rolling Acres
I also propose not making any additions or renovations at Lincoln
Middle School. The students from Lincoln will become 7th & 8th
grade academy students at a high school and I propose changing
Lincoln into a primary school to house the students from Irving and
Kingman which is about 400 – 500 students.
Some teachers will have to come along with the students but not all
of them. Based on enrollment size, the superintendent will call back
the appropriate amount of staff needed to teach students in a right
sized class while at the same time being fiscally responsible.
Likewise, administration, especially central administration should be
cut to fit the district’s enrollment. Student enrollment has reduced 10
– 15% since 2004, so should have administration. It should not have
gone up. Savings: Operational & Maintenance cost + Salaries
• Terminate Consultant Contracts –
Consultant are being hired in and paid approximately $350.00 per
day, 5 days a week that $1,750.00. Multiply that by 42 weeks and
that’s $63,500. I have even heard of some making as much as $500 a
day (which is $2,500 a week, $10,000 a month), but for the sake of
argument we will go with the $350 per day. If you terminate 10
consultants contracts at $350.00 a day, that would save $635,000 in
salaries out of the budget. If there are more than 10 consultants that
would be even more savings. If they make more per day then that’s
even more realized savings and reductions to the deficit.
Savings: $635,000
Terminate Law Firm’s Contract-
This is an instant savings. The board President and/or superintendent
can direct the present law firm to hand over its complete file (copies)
and hire a paid staff attorney to handle the districts’ business. ( I
recommend Beth Jensen) That attorney can farm out work when
necessary to meet the district’s legal needs. If your decision is truly
about money and being fiscally sound then all options should be on
the table. The present law firm charges an annual $300,000 retainer
plus hourly rate. Hire an attorney and pay them $150,000 a year in
salary plus benefits in line with what their districts are doing, about
27-30%. Even if we paid a little more we would save annually with
no hourly rates for board meetings, reading contracts, overseeing
petitions that re turned in for the next election and so on.
Savings: $105,000+
Finally in Reducing Expenses we need to find out what purchasing
services and tort salaries are and get a handle on both of these.
Reports show
Purchasing services 17.1 million
Tort Salaries – 2.1 million
Also by combining 7th & 8th grad academy with high school, you’ll
only have a two tier bus schedule (Primary school and academy
high). This reduces bus scheduled pickups and drop offs by 1/3
approximately thus cutting the cost by 1/3 which although is
reimbursed by about 70% it is included in the budget so this should
be considered as a saving to the 6.6 million transportation budget.
Savings: 2.2 million
INCREASE REVENUE
Sell Prospect Properties
It’s a given that we’ll lose money on this property but if we receive
any it’s better than a total loss. I propose selling the property to the
Park District for .50 on the dollar. I think that is a fair price and
priced to sell fast. I think the Park Board should show integrity and
take us up on that offer because although non-binding, they still
reneged on the agreement.
Potential Income: $450,000.
Sell the closed schools and proposed closed school buildings
This is where the real income comes in. Not only do we sell (or lease)
seven to eight buildings and receive the capital from the sell, by closing
them we have eliminated the operational and maintenance cost to run the
buildings.
Peoria County Government is looking for a place to build the new
Bellwood nursing home, why not off them one of our closed sites. I
suggest Sterling School. Not only will the students benefit from the sell,
but you will be helping the County Government and the residents of
Bellwood.
Potential income: Varies
You can sell enough properties so that you won’t have to worry about
PBC funds or bond ratings.
Apply for and receive Technology & Early Childhood funds
Institute a Vocational Program
There was a program that was proposed in 2005 to the superintendent
that has since been simulated by Canton School District. We should
seize this opportunity and reinstate trades back into the school
district. Pekin school district also has a strong vocational program we
could model.
Potential funding sources for Vo-tech Center
• DCCEO
• Building Trades
• City of Peoria
• Peoria County
• Perkins Grant