PEORIA -- Here's the great divide on a new Peoria School District 150 charter school: should the district's resources go into the proposed math, science and technology school, presumably at the expense of other students?
The proponents of the charter school claim that what works at the charter school will be replicated in other schools. Skeptics don't believe that, and see it as just another way to skim the cream off the district, further impoverishing neighborhood schools in Peoria.
District 150's board is considering approval of a math, science and
technology charter school, a middle school to be
expanded into a high school, to open in the fall of 2010, or 2011, its proponents said. They are former District 150 administrator Cindy Fischer and Illinois Central College vice president Vicky Stewart, who serve on the Peoria Charter School Initiative board.
The plan includes students to be selected by lottery from those that apply, beginning
with grades 5 – 7 then expanding yearly into high school. The plan
contemplates a school with 600 students.
"There will be a culture of academic excellence and accountability, strict discipline, high expectations for behavior," Fischer said.
Stewart added that the school will include a college prep focus with double classes for math and language. Also a pre-engineering curriculum, stronger high school graduation requirements, mandatory tutoring and internships will be included.
In other words, these are the few students being groomed for good jobs in Peoria.
The District 150 Board will meet on Dec. 21 to hear the proposal, then presumably will set a date to vote on whether to approve it. Fischer and Stewart were vague about its financing, saying that state of Illinois funds and/or grant funds would provide some of the money, and District 150 funds would supply the rest.
Illinois Federation of Teachers (IFT) representatives Tom McLaughlin and Sharon Teefey presented alternative views. McLaughlin said the union is not opposed to charter schools "under the right conditions." But "those conditions don't exist in Peoria."
The District 150 Board "just voted to close a high school" Woodruff High School with 900 students, despite "a huge public outcry," he said. "If a charter school is approved, that will OK the establishment of a fourth high school within six years. Is this appropriate when closing a high school" and several elementary schools? "Does it make sense to open another school?" he asked. Where will the money come from? "If we had the corporate community (proponents of the charter school) support that has been focused on this effort" focused on the entire school district "would we be seeing different results?" he asked
McLaughlin said the proposed charter school "will segregate by talent" District 150 students. Only the motivated, with family support, will apply, he said. The school will be successful on its test scores, he said, because other students lacking the brains and talent will drop out.
He also noted that teachers have not been a part of the planning on the charter school initiative.
Afterward, school activist and former teachers union head Terry Knapp, who was in the audience, said that's what happened with the Edison schools, where students with low test scores have been eased out and sent back to neighborhood schools. Edison and another management company want the business of running the proposed charter school, he said. That's a form of privitization of the public schools.
Fischer said that "every teacher will be required to make phone calls and visit parents in the home" to provide support to the students. She said when she was principal at Northmore School, when students from Warner Homes were bussed there, she soon learned that 1/3 or the parents lacked cars and phones, so programs were developed to reach out to them at Valeska Hinton school, and the parents did get involved.
McLaughlin said that and other plans for the charter school can be done in traditional school settings.
Asked whether the charter school will take away talented students from neighborhood schools, causing them to lose students, Stewart responded that "families are already moving" out of District 150, and this initiative and others in the District will slow that.
The district has lost 10,000 students since the 1970s, she said. At ICC, 77 percent of the students from its 10-county district do not meet college level standards for math.
"Charter schools are a mechanism" Stewart said, to change that. "We have developed a new model for high performance."
Regional Schools Superintendent Gerry Brookhart said he and others are working on a $400 million federal grant application, and charter schools are part of the grant.
My take: The charter school proponents have many good ideas for that school, especially creating an environment that rewards academic achievement. That works well in elite private schools.
But as McLaughlin said, why can't these same principles be applied to all District 150 schools?
"The idea is to create better schools for all students," said Sharon Teefey, legislative director for the IFT. "The core values of public education must be dealt with -- based on democracy and equal access. Are we making all public schools better?"
District 150 has wasted millions on programs such as Edison, whose successful techniques also could be replicated without paying royalties to that company. It seems poised to do to the same thing with this charter school, therefore providing unequal education to all students. Some get better schools, smaller classes, more time and tutoring in school, while others do not.
Now it's raising taxes while cutting programs, increasing class size and closing Woodruff High School, a terrible mistake for the community as a whole. The charter school proponents contend they are planning for the future, and cite statistic and theories to back up their ideas.
But data can be used to prove anything. How can the support and/or alienation of the Woodruff community be quantified? Did anyone in District 150 seriously look at ways to keep Woodruff open while saving money elsewhere, including getting rid of Edison? Why hasn't the district been downsized gradually as enrollment dropped? And what a slap at the Woodruff group to open another high school within six years!
In short, can public education in Peoria be saved? Or will a few elite students continue to benefit from elite programs while the rest move out, drop out, or graduate with low test scores but somehow survive and even thrive as adults, if the larger economy ever recovers. And that's the key.
The same mindset that has busted unions and living wage pay for workers now wants this charter school to save education. But education rises and falls with the economy. If ordinary students -- not talented geniuses -- see no future for themselves, why should they waste time with math, science, or even English? Better to have fun today and let the devil take tomorrow.
Peoria needs to discuss these issues along with the charter school proposal.
-- Elaine Hopkins