PEORIA -- The public comments at the Peoria District 150 School Board meeting on June 20 also included the public hearing for the budget.
These comments are covered here and recorded and posted below because the board more than a year ago ended its live cable TV broadcasts which included the comments. Here are the highlights:
I asked the board to investigate the Gulen Movement connection with the Quest Charter Academy and its not for profit parent, Concept Schools. Supt. Grenita Lathan then commented that Concept Schools issued a press release on the controversy, which is on it's website.
The release attempts to explain the financial issues and visa abuse. So apparently it's case closed with District 150. But not with me. Watch for future research.
Controller Kinney reported on the budget, saying salaries are down $2.4 million from last year in the educational fund because there are fewer teachers. The district will be spending $500,000 for technology infrastructure, and $750,000 for high school textbooks. Lathan later said high school social studies textbooks have not been updated in 15 years, and the new ones will include digital information.
The district is still $6 million in the red, Kinney said, because of carry overs between years. Operational funds are $800,000 in the red.
Activist Terry Knapp complained that the district is spending $66,000 to send 55 staff members to conferences this summer. Lathan later said that's because they will receive required training at the conferences which otherwise would have to take place during the school year, requiring the extra expense of substitute teachers.
Knapp said graduation day should not conflict with the state baseball tournament, and that high school lock-ins should take place on graduation night, not a week before, as their purpose is to prevent drinking and accidents. Lathan later agreed with him on that issue.
He then complained about the Gulen Movement involved in public schools, and asked why students are going to Turkey and not London or Madrid. "It's disconcerting to me as a taxpayer" that money might be going to influence children on religion, he said.
Activist Sevino Sierra asked the board not to change the name of Manual High School, which will cost money in reprinting.
Activist Sharon Crews asked about a curriculum audit from Owen Roberts of Florida, apparently performed for free. He is a consultant for a textbook publisher. Lathan replied that the staff actually did the audit.
District 150 also refused to supply any information on Owens through the Freedom of Information Act, saying it didn't have any, Crews said. Her comments will be posted below.
Here is the audio of the comments.
D150 6-20
-- Elaine Hopkins
Here are the comments to the board from Sharon Crews:
As I continue to look at data about discipline in District 150, I am even more convinced that none of the consequences for bad behavior are producing any positive results. All consequences are based on the false assumption that time out of the regular classroom is a punishment.
Students have learned from experience and from friends and siblings that being out of the classroom has very little to do with whether or not they pass or fail a class. District 150 policies foster that perception.
Dr. Lathan recently received applause from me and a room full of retired teachers when she stated her opinion that students should not receive grades for work assigned while they are suspended. Certainly an immediate academic consequence for time out of the classroom would make many students think twice about their behavior and may even lead them to develop or practice self-control. Also, a return to summer school as the ultimate consequence for failing a class would do much to turn things around. The pain of misbehaving has been taken away.
I have yet to hear any definitive plans as to the promised alternative school or how the plans will help to alleviate the rampant discipline problems in District 150.
My second topic for tonight involves my interest in finding out more about Dr. Owen Roberts, whose name appears on District 150’s Curriculum Audit info as an outside auditor who audited six district programs. First, I “Googled” his name to narrow my search. I was fairly sure he wasn’t a cosmetic surgeon or a dentist, so I settled on Owen Roberts, the Assistant Superintendent of Assessment and Accountability for St. Lucie County in Florida, who was chosen to be part of a team from prominent curriculum publisher Houghten Mifflen Harcourt at three significant conferences in Chicago and in Columbia and Brazil.
Under Roberts’ guidance, St. Lucie County partnered with Houghton Mifflin for five years to design educational strategies to improve student learning, using an integration of Hougton Mifflen curriculum products.
Since Roberts seems to have played an important role in the audit and the ensuing decisions, I FOIA’d for data, hoping to achieve some transparency. District 150 would not give me any biographical data about Roberts, would not tell me how long he worked on the project, would not tell me how much time he spent in Peoria and with whom he worked while or if he was in Peoria, and would not provide me with any written communications between Owens and the District 150 personnel with whom he worked. Of course, I wondered when the Board approved his selection as auditor.
The only information I received about Roberts is that “his work was performed at no cost to the district.” Now I really have some questions that I hope the Attorney General will help District 150 to provide. Why would Dr. Owen Roberts choose to work for free for District 150? Does his connection with Houghton Mifflen have anything to do with his willingness to work here? In other words, was Roberts’ work really free? With such secrecy, why wouldn’t we jump to conclusions? One would think that such a man willing to work for free would have been openly applauded by the District. It just makes us wonder.
What I found most interesting is District 150’s strong desire not to provide this information. In fact, upon receiving my FOIA, District 150 filled out an official form to inform the Attorney General that District 150 would not be providing any copies of communications from and to Dr. Roberts with District 150 personnel.
My FOIA request, written on April 11, didn’t receive a reply until June 7. That is much longer than the time frame allowed by FOIA rules. Certainly, that is quite a long time to be told that District 150 cannot provide any information. Meanwhile Dr. Lathan continued to state that there were no pending FOIAs.