PEORIA -- Here's a report from Tracy Fox on what's taking place in environmental policy on fracking:
It’s
a sad week for Illinois. Despite a valiant organizing effort by
Illinois People’s Action (IPA) and its allies Southern Illinoisans
Against Fracturing Our Environment (SAFE) and the Illinois Coalition for
a Moratorium on Fracking (ICMF), a Senate shell bill with fracking
regulations stuffed in as an amendment passed the House Executive
Committee unanimously.
The shell bill, purportedly a change to an
obscure Weights and Measures law, was co-sponsored by Illinois state Senator Dave
Koehler, D-Peoria, and has already passed the Senate unanimously.
The May 20 premiere of Gasland Part II was amazing. The documentary is a
long two-hour recap of what has happened across America since the
original Gasland movie was released. It was so stuffed with details
about harms to local communities, good science gone bad, evil industry
tactics and the failures of democracy, it’s hard to summarize. A few key
things struck me.
Almost every regulatory study I know of … from the
EPA study in Colorado to the Dimmick PA water study to the air emissions
analysis in Dallas … has been released with conclusions suggesting
fracking is harmful and then re-evaluated following heavy industry
pressure and reissued with a “no substantive conclusion” finding.
Promises to connect impacted villages to nearby municipal water supplies
have been brushed aside. Individuals working to make the truth about
fracking known, including Cornell engineering professor Anthony
Ingraffea who challenged the stability of well casings and suggested
fracking’s global warming footprint to be greater than coal and Josh Fox
himself, have been defamed and harassed by the oil and gas industry.
Chilling recaps of insider conferences reveal an industry using tactics
from military PSYOPS (psychological ops) to treat local communities in
fracking’s path like insurgents in a war zone. Double speak by
regulatory officials, governors and President Obama is called out.
The
facts are interwoven with individual stories ranging from dirt poor
backwoods multi-generation homesteads to the middle class mayor of Dish
TX forced from his family home by the air pollution endangering his two
sons to a wealthy Dallas suburbanite whose house is uninhabitable due to
excessive methane levels.
In all of these cases, no justice was served
at all. And, far too many of the other stories had no real ending
because financial hardships forced landowners to settle with the oil and
gas companies and sign gag orders.
The film ends with a look at what
lies ahead and it’s frightening to contemplate. The second of eighteen
liquefied natural gas terminals was recently given a green light by the
Obama administration. It seems fracking won’t even bring us energy
independence or lower prices … instead the gas will be shipped overseas …
ensuring that record oil and gas company profits continue to flow away
from the nexus of harm.
After
the film, Gasland II director Josh Fox and Dr. Sandra Steingraber (PhD
biologist, author, cancer survivor and founder of Americans Against
Fracking) took questions from the audience.
There was a significant
amount of frustration and anger about the coalition of Illinois green
groups that are supporting the regulatory bill with Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC), Illinois Sierra Club and the Illinois
Environmental Council (IEC) taking most of the heat. There was lots of
discussion about the need to build a large, broad-based citizen movement
and heavy pressure to join in on the action in Springfield the next
day.
The film will continue touring this summer and should air in late summer/early fall on HBO.
On May 21, the Executive Committee hearing on the regulatory bill was packed. The
organizing call the night before worked and left most of the staffers
and lobbyists scrambling for a place along the wall when the hearing
started.
Rep. John Bradley, (D, Marion) who headed the committee that drafted the
regulations, gave an impassioned account of the bill and its history. He
claimed that protecting water was his first and foremost objective.
His
speech was followed by supportive remarks from representatives of
Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Governor Pat Quinn. Then Jenn Walling
from the Illinois Environmental Council gave a conciliatory endorsement
suggesting fracking was already happening and, even though none of the
green groups supporting the regulatory bill wanted to see fracking move
forward, it was essential to update the paltry regulations in place
today.
Mark Denzler of the Illinois Manufacturer’s (or Moneygrubbers as
IPA calls it) Association talked about the broad coalition supporting
the bill … environmentalists, labor, farmers, chamber of commerce, etc.
Next
the opposition was given an opportunity. Sandra Steingraber spoke from
her New York experiences and her scientific training asking for a
moratorium so that the science can be settled.
She asked those who had
come to the hearing to oppose the bill to stand and 80-100 people rose.
She challenged the notion that fracking was already happening likening
Jenn Walling’s remarks to a red scare suggesting that there was a
drilling rig under every bed in Southern Illinois.
Dr. Steingraber
closed with a plea that Illinois value itself more and say no to
fracking.
Josh Fox spoke next and asked how many on the committee had
actually visited a fracking site. I am pretty cynical, but even I was a
bit taken aback that not one person on the committee raised a hand. He
shared a number of human stories he had recorded in his journeys across
America.
Carolyn Raffensperger, attorney and former head of the Illinois
Environmental Council, also spoke, pointing out that without
enforcement the regulations would mean nothing. She then cited a March
2013 conference where the Illinois Attorney General’s office lamented
just this issue with regard to both IEPA and IDNR.
She, along with Dr.
Bill Rau from IPA and Tabitha Tripp of SAFE, urged a moratorium due to
the number of unknowns, the concerns about air and water supply and the
lack of local community participation in the “closed door” meetings
where the regulations were hammered out.
Each
opposition speaker was given less and less time and finally things came
to an end. The vote quickly proceeded with no questions of any witness
and the bill was unanimously approved.
When
Jen Walling first spoke, I disagreed with her but remembered that
people of good conscience can disagree. Then as I watched her trade
nudges and whispers with Rep. Bradley during the opposition testimony I
felt a little less charitable.
The reality of the situation began to
sink in.
Those closed door meetings included no doctors, no engineers,
no public health professions and no local community representatives.
Instead, the environment was represented by three attorneys (NRDC, IEC
and Environmental Law & Policy Center) and a registered lobbyist/MBA
(Faith in Place).
Sierra Club, an organization that misguidedly
supports the regulations on similar grounds, was part of the endorsing
coalition but not included in the actual closed door meetings.
There
have been no public hearings, there has been no health study, no
evaluation of IDNR/IEPA capacity to regulate, no guidebook created to
help local communities manage the impact, etc. This is not democracy to
me.
The
after-the-fact press conference was well-attended and covered in the
Tribune, Crain’s Chicago Business and a few other places. Most papers
just picked up the Trib story in part.
At the press conference the
witnesses reiterated their remarks and Dr. Lora Chamberlain of ICMF
began laying the groundwork for next steps … find a sponsor to introduce
an unfriendly moratorium amendment on the house floor, find a sponsor
for a senate shell bill to put a moratorium in play on the senate side,
and appeal to Governor Quinn.
A portion of the group then went to
Quinn’s office in the Capitol demanding a meeting and three people
staged a sit in resulting in one arrest. These are pretty much last
ditch efforts, but in my opinion all worth pursuing because even if they
don’t proceed they may provide momentum to clean up the front end
(property rights, forced pooling, etc.) and back end (injection well
disposal) of the horrid fracking process.
Next,
the fracking regulations will reportedly go before the full Illinois
house. It seems the game’s been rigged but I’m hoping for a miracle, and
signing off to send a few more faxes and make some phone calls.
-- Tracy Fox
My take: What do the Dems get out of this? Union support? Campaign contributions? Sad. Koehler used to be a friend of the environment. Now he's willing to sell it out for money? As for the Sierra Club and others, who knows what they expect to get. Guess they've joined the Obama/teachers union strategy to turn on their base and give in to the opposition without a fight. Good luck with that. (Not.) Or maybe they're hoping for a big contribution from the oil and gas industry and their allies in this fracking fight. Will they accept it? Finally, the lesson here is that democracy seems to be dead in Illinois, as polticians don't care if people don't want what they're pushing. They think we'll forget when the next election comes along. We wont.
-- Elaine Hopkins